Barnstaple

Borough

Published in The History of Parliament: the House of Commons 1715-1754, ed. R. Sedgwick, 1970
Available from Boydell and Brewer

Background Information

Right of Election:

in the freemen

Number of voters:

about 3201

Elections

DateCandidateVotes
3 Feb. 1715SIR ARTHUR CHICHESTER 
 JOHN ROLLE 
22 Feb. 1718JOHN BASSET vice Chichester, deceased 
22 Nov. 1721SIR HUGH ACLAND vice Basset, deceased 
24 Mar. 1722SIR HUGH ACLAND181
 THOMAS WHETHAM162
 Sir Bourchier Wrey159
 Richard Coffin133
21 Aug. 1727RICHARD COFFIN 
 THEOPHILUS FORTESCUE 
27 Apr. 1734SIR JOHN CHICHESTER 
 THEOPHILUS FORTESCUE 
1 Dec. 1740JOHN BASSET vice Chichester, deceased234
 Lewis Stucley2
7 May 1741HENRY ROLLE 
 JOHN HARRIS 
2 July 1747HENRY ROLLE 
 THOMAS BENSON 
20 Jan. 1748SIR BOURCHIER WREY vice Rolle, called to the Upper House 

Main Article

There was no single predominant interest at Barnstaple, which usually returned members of local families without a contest. The most important of these were the Rolles of Stevenstone, originally Tory, who went over to the Government in 1739, and Hugh Fortescue, Lord Clinton, an opposition Whig, whose house dominated the approach to Barnstaple. At the by-election in 1748, when the Rolles, supported by the Government, and the Fortescues, supported by the Prince of Wales, each put up candidates, Lord Clinton wrote to the Prince’s election manager:

As I always know it to be a very troublesome and venal borough, I had totally neglected it for these seven years last past, and resolved never to be concerned with it more ... so had it not been to serve H.R.H. nothing should have tempted me to concern myself with such an affair, for besides all the monstrous expense, I have been scarce quiet a day at my own house.2

In the end it was decided to give up the contest on the ground that ‘the expense would have grown enormous’.3 Lord Rolle, who sponsored the successful candidate, told Newcastle after the election that since his connexion in 1739 he had spent £7,000 in ‘supporting the Government interest at Barnstaple’.4 In the 2nd Lord Egmont’s electoral survey, c.1749-50, Barnstaple is described as ‘between Lord Clinton and Lord Rolle’.

Author: Shirley Matthews

Notes

  • 1. Lord Ebrington, 'A By-Election in 1747', The Nineteenth Cent. Rev. xxv. 921, 925.
  • 2. Clinton to Dr. Ayscough, 10 Oct. 1747, Fortescue mss.
  • 3. Lord Ebrington, op. cit. 933; HMC 3rd Rep. 220.
  • 4. Add. 32714, f. 444.