DICK, Quintin (1777-1858), of 20 Curzon Street, Mayfair, Mdx.
Available from Boydell and Brewer
Family and Education
b. Mar. 1777, 1st s. of Samuel Dick, E.I. proprietor and merchant, of Dublin by Charlotte, da. of Nicholas Forster of Tullaghan, co. Monaghan. educ. Trinity, Dublin 7 Oct. 1793, aged 16½; L. Inn 1797, called [I] 1800. unm. suc. fa. 1802.
MP [I] 1800.
Capt. W. Essex militia 1839, lt.-col. 1846-52.
Quintin Dick owed his start in public life to the great wealth of his father, a Dublin East India linen merchant who represented the fourth generation of a Scots family settled in county Antrim.1 He sat for Dunleer in the Irish parliament just before the Act of Union which, as his kinsman John Foster’s* nominee, he opposed. In the same year he was called to the Irish bar. Soon afterwards his father died and he came to London, where his uncle and namesake was a merchant,2 and probably went into business with him. In 1803 he entered the English Parliament on the Buller interest for West Looe, presumably by purchase, for his conduct was independent.
Dick took his seat on 2 Feb. 1804. On 2 Mar. he objected to the debate on the Irish exchange and currency as tending to diminish public confidence in the Bank of Ireland and criticized a pamphlet of Lord King’s attacking the Bank: tranquillity and English backing would restore faith in the institution. He had some objection to Pitt’s additional force bill in June 1804, appearing to have voted against it on the 15th, and was listed as ‘Foxite and Grenvillite’ by Pitt’s friends in September, but on 8 Apr. 1805 he voted with the government minority against the censure of Melville. He was listed as a Pittite in July.
Left without a seat in 1806, he was brought in (by purchase through the Hon. Henry Wellesley*) for Cashel, an Irish borough placed at the disposal of administration, in 1807. He had at first bargained for Tralee for £5,000, but Castlereagh stopped this, ‘that he may not mistake that he owes his seat to government. He voted with us in opposition and we have therefore no right to be suspicious, but it is better there should be no doubt as to the quarter whence the seat is derived.’ He may have been the ‘Mr Dick’ who applied too late to become one of the ‘Danish commissioners’ in November 1807.3 In March 1809 he found himself in disagreement with government in favouring the investigation of the Duke of York’s alleged abuse of military patronage and, feeling unable to vote with administration, resigned his seat of his own volition after a private discussion of the matter with Castlereagh. Dick evidently regarded it as a matter of honour to resign, but complained loudly of obtaining no rebate on his premature vacation of the seat. An unsuccessful attempt was then made by William Alexander Madocks to accuse government of having forced Dick to resign his seat, 11 May 1809. The Irish secretary reported next day:
Mr Madocks brought forward his motion last night, which was answered in the first instance in a most proper and manly manner by Perceval. The former stated his intention to examine evidence as to the corrupt interference of the Treasury with seats in Parliament, beginning with Mr Quintin Dick and the borough of Cashel, and Lord Castlereagh’s alleged requisition to the latter to give up his seat for voting against the Duke of York. Lord Milton moved one amendment, that instead of being heard at the bar of the House, the charge should be referred to a select committee, and Mr Tierney moved that it should be restricted to the putting Mr Dick out of Parliament, saying nothing as to the bringing him in. Both amendments were negatived without a division, and on the main question 85 voted for Mr Madocks’s motion, and 310 against it. This is rather a damper upon Jacobinism.4
Dick himself wrote to Madocks and also to his kinsman Foster assuring them that ‘the statement of Lord Castlereagh having suggested to me that I ought to resign my seat rather than vote against the Duke of York’ was ‘totally unfounded’. Madocks had alleged that Spencer Perceval was involved in putting pressure on Dick but Perceval stated that, on the contrary, he had pressed him to continue in the House.5
After this, Dick, who was ‘thrown out of his gig and nearly killed’ in August 1820, was out of Parliament until 1826, when he resumed his public career, as a Tory opposed to Catholic relief. He retired in 1852 and died unmarried 26 Mar. 1858, aged 81, ‘respected as a man of in