Go To Section
Boston
Borough
Available from Boydell and Brewer
Background Information
Right of Election:
in the resident freemen paying scot and lot
Number of voters:
about 250
Elections
Date | Candidate | Votes |
---|---|---|
1 Feb. 1715 | HENRY HERON | |
RICHARD WYNN | ||
7 Dec. 1719 | RICHARD ELLYS vice Wynn, deceased | 81 |
Sir William Massingberd | 60 | |
24 Mar. 1722 | RICHARD ELLYS | 122 |
HENRY PACEY | 102 | |
William Thornton | 81 | |
Charles Wood | 50 | |
18 Aug. 1727 | RICHARD ELLYS | |
HENRY PACEY | ||
22 Jan. 1730 | HENRY HARE, Baron Coleraine, vice Pacey, deceased | 71 |
Charles Wood | 46 | |
Bennet Longton | 17 | |
William Marten | 13 | |
27 Apr. 1734 | ALBEMARLE BERTIE | |
RICHARD FYDELL | ||
5 May 1741 | LORD VERE BERTIE | |
JOHN MICHELL | ||
27 June 1747 | JOHN MICHELL | 165 |
LORD VERE BERTIE | 114 | |
Francis Beckford | 106 |
Main Article
At George I’s accession the chief interests at Boston were in the 1st Duke of Ancaster, recorder of the borough,1 and the Tory dominated corporation. Under the Tory ministry at the end of Anne’s reign the corporation had been able to return two Tories, Richard Wynn and Henry Heron, who were re-elected in 1715 unopposed. After the by-election caused by Wynn’s death in 1719 Richard Ellys, a Whig, defeated Wynn’s nephew, Sir William Massingberd, a Tory, on whose petition the House of Commons resolved that the only freemen entitled to vote were those claiming their freedom ‘by birth or servitude’.2 The effect of this decision was to prevent the corporation from carrying out their intention of creating sufficient new freemen to regain control of the second seat, which was held by Ellys till 1734 and thereafter by the 2nd Duke of Ancaster’s nominees. The other seat was filled by Tories brought in by the corporation.