Go To Section
Leominster
Borough
Available from Boydell and Brewer
Background Information
Right of Election:
in inhabitants paying scot and lot
Number of voters:
about 300 in 1717;1 over 400 in 1747
Elections
Date | Candidate | Votes |
---|---|---|
1 Feb. 1715 | THOMAS CONINGSBY, Baron Coningsby | 219 |
EDWARD HARLEY | 155 | |
Henry Gorges | 138 | |
19 Mar. 1717 | GEORGE CASWALL vice Coningsby, called to the Upper House | 190 |
Richard Gorges | 38 | |
Henry Gorges | 20 | |
Election declared void, 30 May 1717 | ||
17 June 1717 | GEORGE CASWALL | |
Henry Gorges | ||
24 Mar. 1721 | WILLIAM BATEMAN vice Caswall, expelled the House | |
27 Mar. 1722 | SIR ARCHER CROFT | 253 |
SIR GEORGE CASWALL | 205 | |
Edward Harley | 92 | |
James Clarke | 30 | |
— Raby | 16 | |
22 Aug. 1727 | SIR GEORGE CASWALL | 265 |
WILLIAM BATEMAN, Visct. Bateman | 262 | |
Sir Archer Croft | 109 | |
29 Apr. 1734 | ROBERT HARLEY | 303 |
SIR GEORGE CASWALL | 262 | |
Sir Robert de Cornwall | 137 | |
8 May 1741 | JOHN CASWALL | 339 |
CAPEL HANBURY | 330 | |
Robert Harley | 152 | |
Bryan Crowther | 7 | |
29 Mar. 1742 | ROBERT HARLEY vice Caswall, deceased | 210 |
Sir Robert de Cornwall | 101 | |
George Hanbury | 5 | |
John Bach | 0 | |
30 June 1747 | SIR ROBERT DE CORNWALL | 391 |
JAMES PEACHEY | 291 | |
Sir Charles Hanbury Williams | 127 | |
Richard Gorges | 8 |
Main Article
Leominster had a reputation for venality. In 1717 George Caswall’s agent was paying up to 20 guineas a man;2 in 1721 Edward Harley, then M.P. for the borough, said that it had ‘become mercenary, and the best bidder will have the best interest to be served’;3 and all that the 2nd Lord Egmont could say for it in his electoral survey, c. 1749-50, was that he did ‘not think it so venal as to be carried by the best bidder’. During most of the period 1715-54 one of the seats went to ‘the best bidder’ in the persons of the Caswalls, father and son, and of James Peachey, a nabob, and the other to one of the neighbouring gentry. All the Members, except Capel Hanbury, had estates in or near the borough, and all but Hanbury, who, however, was a connexion of Lady Coningsby’s, and Peachey, came from long established local families. In 1745 Velters Cornewall told Henry Pelham that ‘Lady Coningsby, Lord Oxford, and Sir Robert Cornwall ... have the love and almost all the votes of that town [Leominster]’.4