Bridgwater

Borough

Published in The History of Parliament: the House of Commons 1715-1754, ed. R. Sedgwick, 1970
Available from Boydell and Brewer

Background Information

Right of Election:

in inhabitant householders paying scot and lot

Number of voters:

about 250

Elections

DateCandidateVotes
1 Feb. 1715GEORGE DODINGTON 
 THOMAS PALMER 
19 Apr. 1720WILLIAM PITT vice Dodington, deceasedmajority 17
 Henry Herbert, Lord Herbert 
21 Mar. 1722THOMAS PALMER172
 GEORGE BUBB DODINGTON139
 Samuel Pitt116
10 Apr. 1724DODINGTON re-elected after appointment to office 
17 Aug. 1727GEORGE BUBB DODINGTON 
 SIR HALSWELL TYNTE 
5 Feb. 1731THOMAS PALMER vice Tynte, deceased 
29 Apr. 1734THOMAS PALMER180
 GEORGE BUBB DODINGTON156
 — Tothill56
7 Apr. 1735CHARLES WYNDHAM vice Palmer, deceased 
12 May 17411VERE POULETT158
 GEORGE BUBB DODINGTON126
 Sir Charles Wyndham110
31 Dec. 1744DODINGTON re-elected after appointment to office 
27 June 1747PEREGRINE POULETT 
 GEORGE BUBB DODINGTON 
19 Jan. 1753ROBERT BALCH vice Poulett, deceased 

Main Article

In 1715 one of the Bridgwater seats was held by George Dodington, whose family estate was near the borough, where he had the government interest, derived from the customs and excise officers at the port. Both interests were inherited by his nephew, Bubb Dodington, who shared the representation with local Tory country gentlemen till 1741.

At the general election of 1741, when Dodington had gone over to the Opposition, the ministerial candidate was Vere Poulett, on whose behalf Walpole wrote to a Somerset landowner, Sir William Pynsent:

You may be surprised at receiving a letter from a perfect stranger, but ... I am informed you have a very considerable interest at Bridgwater and as among the candidates for the ensuing election Mr. Poulett has most sincerely my best wishes, and Mr. Dodington the contrary, I shall be much obliged to you if you will dispose your interest at Bridgwater in such a manner as may most contribute to the success of the former and the disappointment of the latter. I never ask favours, but with a design to acknowledge them, in the best manner I am able, and if you will lay this obligation upon me you shall find I am a grateful man.2

In spite of Walpole’s efforts, Dodington secured his return at the expense of Sir Charles Wyndham, the other opposition candidate, by coming to an agreement with Poulett, whereby he obtained the official vote.3 Thenceforth he shared the borough with the Pouletts till 1753 when, owing to family divisions, they did not put up a candidate, leaving the vacancy to be filled by a local man, Robert Balch, put up by the corporation.4

Author: Shirley Matthews

Notes

  • 1. Figures taken from Ld. Poulett to Hen. Pelham, 12 Dec. 1750, Newcastle (Clumber) mss.
  • 2. 26 Mar. 1741, Hoare mss.
  • 3. Ld. Poulett to Pelham, loc. cit.; Sir Chas. Wyndham to Ld. Gower, 28 Mar. 1741, Granville mss, PRO.
  • 4. Dodington Diary, 160-1.