Kingston-upon-Hull

Borough

Published in The History of Parliament: the House of Commons 1715-1754, ed. R. Sedgwick, 1970
Available from Boydell and Brewer

Background Information

Right of Election:

in the freemen

Number of voters:

about 900

Elections

DateCandidateVotes
2 Feb. 1715SIR WILLIAM ST. QUINTIN 
 WILLIAM MAISTER 
13 Mar. 1717NATHANIEL ROGERS vice Maister, deceased 
11 July 1720ST. QUINTIN re-elected after appointment to office 
31 Mar. 1722NATHANIEL ROGERS773
 SIR WILLIAM ST. QUINTIN448
 George Crowle420
23 Jan. 1724GEORGE CROWLE vice St. Quintin, deceased419
 Sir Henry Hoghton299
23 Aug. 1727JOSEPH MICKLETHWAIT, Visct. Micklethwait719
 GEORGE CROWLE717
 Matthew Chitty St. Quintin167
7 Mar. 1733CROWLE re-elected after appointment to office 
6 Feb. 1734HENRY MAISTER vice Micklethwait, deceased 
1 May 1734GEORGE CROWLE389
 HENRY MAISTER384
 Robert Thornton7
17 May 1738CROWLE re-elected after appointment to office 
7 May 1741GEORGE CROWLE 
 WILLIAM CARTER 
2 May 1744HARRY PULTENEY vice Carter, deceased 
29 June 1747LORD ROBERT MANNERS594
 THOMAS CARTER559
 Richard Crowle353

Main Article

At George I’s accession, the chief interests at Hull were in the sitting Whig Members, Sir William St. Quintin, an East Riding baronet, and William Maister, a Hull merchant, who had shared the representation continuously since the reign of William III. They were supported by the Government, who had an interest based on the officers of the garrison, the customs, and Trinity House, and by the corporation, who could influence elections through the mayor as returning officer and the power of creating freemen. After their deaths the predominant figure in Hull politics was George Crowle, a townsman, who, although originally returned against a candidate backed by the Government and the corporation,1 steadily supported Walpole and Pelham, building up a strong interest at great expense to himself. Crowle held his seat for nearly a quarter of a century, the other seat being filled by government supporters without serious opposition. When he retired in 1747 he gave his interest against his brother, to a government candidate,2 Lord Robert Manners, who held his seat for the next thirty-five years. In the 2nd Lord Egmont’s electoral survey, c.1749-50, Hull is described as ‘in the Crown’s hands’.

Author: Romney R. Sedgwick

Notes

  • 1. J. R. Boyle, ‘The Story of a Parl. Election’, Hull Times, 3 Jan. 1903.
  • 2. Poll bk.; Thomas Hill’s letter bk. 8 July 1747, Attingham mss, Salop RO.